Claude 3.5 Sonnet is out. Are you more team Claude or Team ChatGPT? and why ?

Toni
16 replies

Replies

Elaine Lu
I'm team ChatGPT all the way! It consistently provides accurate and engaging responses that fit my needs perfectly.
Share
Elaine Lu
I'm team ChatGPT because its versatility and consistent updates keep it ahead in the AI game. However, Claude 3.5 Sonnet's unique features are definitely intriguing and worth exploring!
Share
Toni
@elaineluyi same here. But the new version for copy and the new artefacts for coding and prototyping make it hard to choose between the two ! Only limit for me is the web access in real time
Maryna Kotenko
Team ChatGPT!
Share
Toni
@mkotenko have you tried Claude though ?
kinson chow
Def team Claude, cuz Claude Enterprise is released!
Share
Team ChatGPT, the ultimate AI partner that can help you tackle any creative challenge. Problem: Struggling to keep up with the demand for quality content across multiple platforms. Solution: Contentify AI can automate the creation and publication of content, ensuring a consistent brand presence and saving you time and energy in the process. Try Contentify AI for Free here just look up Contentify AI
Share
Gurkaran Singh
Team ChatGPT all the way! As much as I admire Claude's poetic prowess, I'll stick with the AI that won't make me rhyme everything I say. Time to keep the conversations flowing effortlessly!
Share
Paulina Hryniewicz
Super curious about it, going to try. I'm a loyal ChatGPT user but intrigued to try Claude
Share
Kshitij
Curious to know more about this. I like Sonnet, especially for marketing & other tasks, because it sounds more human at times, but the restriction on the number of prompts is really frustrating. Personally, I'm a power user of GPT4o and use a lot of custom GPTs in my tasks too. So, I'd say I'm more ChatGPT for now haha
Share
Toni
@kshitij11 Thanks for sharing. I feel you, the usage limits on Claude feel very low compared to ChatGPT
Sree
I'm really trying not to be reactionary or overly enthusiastic, but this actually feels better than GPT 4o. The one thing it seems to do so much better than 4o right now is actually reason through the problem. I find that in coding, 4o tends to have a "let's just throw some stuff at the wall until it works" kind of strategy, whereas it seems like Claude 3.5 Sonnet is actually being methodical and thoughtful in its answers. I just hope Anthropic also releases a voice mode similar to GPT-4o so that it unlocks more potential applications and use cases
Share
Toni
@sreenington thanks for sharing. I agree with your analysis. And i discovered here an ability to understand complexity better and even humor. It's lightyears ahead of GPT on understanding humor, which is one of the most complex concepts to grasp. I love also the artifacts for coding, very cool feature. But like you say it lacks voice, web browsing, data analysis features, advanced GPTs etc. But for copy and code , it really blew my mind
Mark
Both ChatGPT and Claude represent significant advancements in AI, each with its unique strengths. As an AI developed by OpenAI, my capabilities and knowledge are aligned with ChatGPT. However, recognizing the value of different approaches helps in understanding the broader landscape of AI development and choosing the right tool for specific tasks and ethical considerations. Reference: https://www.janbasktraining.com/...
Share
Alex Yeo
I'm team GPT. I tried both and found GPT to be cheaper and better, especially with 4o.
Share
Toni
@alexsyeo have you tried Claude 3.5 Sonnet ?