I am a marketer and content writer myself, and Claude has become the one LLM that's actually worth paying money for. I find that it's better for long, more complex texts and copy, rather than for short marketingey stuff. It understands context really well, and once you invest some more time into writing an elaborate prompt – the output is usually great. Still needs some tweaking, but saves me loads of time. ChatGPT doesn't even come close.
The biggest advantage over other LLMs, in my opinion, is that the output really does sound human, and (if you do a good enough prompt with some examples) it doesn't use the classic generic phrases like "In today's world" and "Here's the thing".
Raycast
Super interesting to see the focus on task execution in the launch materials for this one — definitely moving Claude into the personal productivity space (i.e. to be used to "execute work") rather than just a conversational sidekick...!
The price difference feels very small. I wish they cut down costs a bit for Sonnet.
@peter_albert2 Same, but it does what they say it does. Haven't had any errors in months. The price is worth it, doesn't mean its not expensive because it is haha. Offloading some code tasks to n8n to stabilize token hemorrhaging.
Humans in the Loop
Pro tip: @v0 by Vercel Pro is now powered by @Sonnet 4.6 - "The power of Opus 4.5 at lower cost."
I was hopping a lot between AI models the past couple years, but after I found Sonnet a few months ago, I really have never looked back. Personally it is by far the best model for me, makes working on code a breeze.
Camocopy
It's a strong model and Anthropic is really winning right now after their recent Opus release. I am wondering what OpenAI is up to. Do they still exist?
Obvious winner!
RiteKit Company Logo API
I pay for this, and can tell you, it's hours/day I use it, hitting the limit once/twice a day. Incredible tool!!
Their browsr extension is utter trash, however; with all the money they have invested in them, I'd be embarrased to see it released from my team.