We've used Gitstart to augment our developer bandwidth at codewp.ai for a few months (working on platform rebuild / launch). It's a great offering. The founder, Hamza, and our support team are very responsive and attentive. The outputs for our PRs are great quality. I also like the fact that we're helping real world developers level up their skills without the pain of training them ourselves :).
We're a bit different than some of the companies mentioned here, very small, agile, and quick moving. Was worried that GitStart wouldn't make sense, but in fact, they allowed us to focus the more complex (and fun) aspects of our platform while getting rid of time draws - a great asset for a small startup.
Costs are pretty accurate, communication is good. No complaints at all, they're definitely worth a try.
Congratulations on the launch! As a former intern at GitStart, I've witnessed firsthand the dedication and hard work that has gone into making this achievement possible. It's truly inspiring to see GitStart grow and stand out more every day. Best wishes to the entire team!
Very impressed with the responsiveness of the Gitstart team and roll out support for a new language and framework in a matter of days for us Hospitable.com.
Really excited to see where the team can push this fantastic idea and execution! 🚀
Congrats on the launch - love the idea of on demand developers. Quick question though - do you think in the future you'll open up the fulfilment for partners?
Wow, GitStart sounds like a game-changer for managing pull requests! The idea of assigning tickets and getting back PRs while only paying for the code that gets merged is brilliant. It aligns to optimize the development process and ensure quality code.
I'm curious to know more about the process of sending tickets to multiple engineers who review each other's code. How does GitStart ensure that the code review process is efficient and thorough? Are there any specific algorithms or techniques in place to handle this?
Also, seeing that GitStart is already being used by Cal.com, Supabase, and SourceGraph is impressive. Did these companies provide feedback on how GitStart has improved their workflow or enhanced their development teams' collaboration?
Lastly, as someone who appreciates open-source projects, I would love to hear more about the experiences of individuals or communities using GitStart on public repos. Has it helped them streamline their contribution process and encourage more code reviews?
I look forward to hearing more about GitStart and its impact on the development community!
I have had the privilege of collaborating extensively with the founding members of GitStart in the past, an experience I found truly remarkable.
Currently, we are using GitStart for my startup, and it has really helped us scale up our dev capacity without having to deal with the challenges of hiring. With GitStart, my senior developers can focus on high-level architectural designs, while the labor-intensive task of implementation is seamlessly delegated to GitStart. This collaboration has proven to be highly beneficial for the growth and efficiency of the team.
