Wow, GitStart sounds like a game-changer for managing pull requests! The idea of assigning tickets and getting back PRs while only paying for the code that gets merged is brilliant. It aligns to optimize the development process and ensure quality code.
I'm curious to know more about the process of sending tickets to multiple engineers who review each other's code. How does GitStart ensure that the code review process is efficient and thorough? Are there any specific algorithms or techniques in place to handle this?
Also, seeing that GitStart is already being used by Cal.com, Supabase, and SourceGraph is impressive. Did these companies provide feedback on how GitStart has improved their workflow or enhanced their development teams' collaboration?
Lastly, as someone who appreciates open-source projects, I would love to hear more about the experiences of individuals or communities using GitStart on public repos. Has it helped them streamline their contribution process and encourage more code reviews?
I look forward to hearing more about GitStart and its impact on the development community!