Getting hunted: A boon or a bane
Puneet Kohli
8 replies
So we all know that PH has changed their algorithm and functioning around being hunted. It’s not as useful or prestigious as it was once upon a time, and definitely levels the playing field for new launchers.
The question now is, would you consider being hunted a boon or a bane?
Replies
Puneet Kohli@puneet_kohli
Careerflow LinkedIn Optimization Tool
In my opinion it’s more of a bane, from the perspective that people generally appreciate makers launching their own product and are more willing to support them as opposed to seeing a top hunter.
It’s a boon, because, you can get eyeballs through that hunter’s audience and get a social stamp of validation.
I’m conflicted myself on whether it’s more good or bad, especially if you know how the platform works
Share
Warmup Inbox
Hunters are less relevant than before, but it still gives you a small boost of exposure. However, most of the exposure is from outside of product hunt: makers will usually share your launch on Linkedin and Twitter. So it is useful to have a hunter with a follower base in your niche.
I would always recommend trying looking for a hunter at least for 1 or 2 weeks. Even if no hunter agrees to support your launch, it will give you some connections, with quite influential people.
Careerflow LinkedIn Optimization Tool
@fabian_maume That's definitely true. If the hunter does not share on their social media would you still say it's worth it?
LaunchPedia
Boon if the hunter is more popular in your domain and is willing to promote your launch with his/her email list & social media followers.
Careerflow LinkedIn Optimization Tool
@karthik_tatikonda What about say the top 5 hunters on PH? They may not have a niche
I agree with you both @puneet_kohli @fabian_maume