What do you think about the business model of AI art?
Elara Thorn
17 replies
I’m talking about flashy AI art, not AI art with branding and marketing purposes.
Replies
suwaidi online@suwaidi_online
The AI art business model is innovative, offering scalable creativity for industries like marketing, gaming, and design. However, ethical concerns around originality, copyright, and artist recognition must be addressed to ensure sustainable growth.
Share
Launching soon!
I think it's still quite challenging to resolve copyright issues at this stage. Perhaps this business model will need more time to mature.
The business model of AI art is fascinating and evolving rapidly. On one hand, it democratizes art creation, allowing anyone to generate unique pieces with minimal skills or resources. This opens up new revenue streams for artists and developers through subscriptions, licensing, or custom commissions.
However, it also raises questions about originality and copyright. As AI-generated art becomes more prevalent, defining ownership and ensuring fair compensation for creators becomes crucial. Additionally, there's potential for market saturation, which might affect traditional artists.
Overall, AI art can complement the art world by offering new tools and possibilities, but it requires careful consideration of ethical and economic implications to ensure it benefits everyone involved.
Well, it’s pretty interesting but also controversial. On one hand, AI art tools make creating art more accessible. But many artists feel their work is being copied or devalued. I think the business side needs to find a balance - maybe by compensating artists whose styles are used, and being transparent about how these models are trained.
Well, it’s pretty interesting but also controversial. On one hand, AI art tools can make creation more accessible and efficient. But on the other hand, there are concerns about copyright and originality. I think if artists can find a way to collaborate with AI instead of seeing it as a threat, there could be some cool opportunities. It’s still evolving though!
I don't really support the flashy AI art. The ease of creating AI artwork would probably lead to an over-saturation of low-effort visuals. This will potentially devalue art in the market and diminishing opportunities for genuine artists to thrive.
@feliciana_liu Yes, I can't appreciate it either. Many people just think it’s cool to use AI to generate such effects. It has no meaning other than attracting people’s likes.
@elara_thorn I also think so. AI art, while impressive in its technical execution, can't convey the genuine emotions and intentions.
From a consumer standpoint, AI-generated art is an intriguing mix of novelty and personalization.
I think it's a fascinating way to democratize creativity, but pricing transparency and ethical use are areas that need more attention.
AI art opens up new creative possibilities that were once unimaginable allowing me to create stunning visuals quickly.
For me, the concept of AI art is fascinating but it's a tricky area when it comes to valuing its authenticity
AI art is a great way to get unique, quick designs.
I don't know if it'll ever have the same "soul" that a human artist can bring to their work.
Business model behind AI art could make a lot of money.
In my view, the business model of flashy AI art is quite innovative. It allows artists to produce works quickly. However, there are concerns. The ease of creation may lead to an oversaturation of the market with a large number of similar or low-quality works, making it difficult for truly outstanding pieces to stand out. Also, there are questions about the authenticity and artistic value of such works, as they are generated by algorithms rather than purely human creativity.
Instead of displacing pros, I believe these models should concentrate more on assisting amateur producers.