What tasks are likely to performed by Humans even after GPT-10?
Ankur Singh
38 replies
Replies
Chris Messina@chrismessina
Mammoth 2
GPT10? You'd need to harness the power of the sun to power such an LLM.
Share
Vadoo AI
@chrismessina AI might harness power 'Matrix' style!!
Innovations in the hardware side should optimise the cost to run such models.
Does anyone know about the movie 'Absolutely Anything'?
I'm thinking about it, but not sure if anything interesting will happen.
Photosweep
Number 2
Chat with YouTube
Tell a personal story and not lie.
Chat with YouTube
humans can create stories because they have real experiences. ML on the other hand does not. They can only lie about it. Sometimes humans are good at detecting lies.
So I cheated and asked chatGPT 4 your question verbatim. Here was the reply:
While I am designed to be an advanced language model that can perform a variety of tasks, there are certain tasks that I am not capable of performing as well as humans. Here are some examples:
Emotional support: While I can offer advice and suggestions, I do not have the ability to understand and empathize with human emotions in the same way that a human can.
Physical tasks: As an AI language model, I am not able to perform physical tasks such as cooking, cleaning, or driving.
Creative tasks: While I can assist with tasks such as writing or brainstorming, I do not have the same level of creativity and intuition as a human when it comes to generating new ideas.
Personalized healthcare: While I can offer general health advice and information, I am not a substitute for personalized medical advice from a healthcare professional who can take into account an individual's unique medical history and circumstances.
In summary, while I can perform many tasks and provide valuable assistance, there are certain tasks that require human capabilities and cannot be replaced by an AI language model like ChatGPT-10.
Vadoo AI
@alexia_georghiou Hopefully this is true but the current model doesn't know what GPT-10 is capable of.
@singh_ankur yeah …I guess this is an example of the 10% hallucinating. It just went with what I asked and answered accordingly:)
@veit_josef_schneider I wonder how much it covers so we won’t panic with the capabilities. I think you are right.
I think fact-checking and editing for style.
You can only verify so much information online—that's why major publishers and publications hire fact-checkers to actually call people (although less of an issue in saas and other industries that intentionally use spin).
Using AI to copy-edit text for grammatical issues is helpful. But style is often a personal choice that changes based on the audience. I think a lot of AI that tries to do it currently is too broad (professional, informal, academic, etc.)
That said, if AI could start using data from stylebooks to understand different rules/reasons behind editing decisions and do so effectively, that could be a total game-changer. I just think it's harder to train AI to do that than black-and-white grammar checking, but I hope someone proves me wrong some day!
Comment Deleted
anyone remember that bruce willis flick "Surrogates"
The creation of content, the exploration of uncharted territory
PromptForge
Im still hopeful that AI is going to be an incredible assistant much more than it is just a replacement for most jobs. Some will be replaced no doubt but I think many more jobs will remain but be highly impacted by AI’s cooperation.
Physical tasks 😛
Vadoo AI
@sakshi_gahlawat Robo-GPT
@singh_ankur Yeah, you're right. But I think it's the machines using our human sense of taste. Machines can learn from past preferences (labeled data), but can they discover new trends and lead human taste?
For example:
Machines can create thousands of poems, but they cannot pick out the one that universally moves humans.
Why are humans moved by a poem? I believe it comes from our ability to empathize, from our universal memories, experiences, and sympathy within our species.
However, the growth process of artificial intelligence determines that it cannot experience the sufferings and joys that humans go through, cannot truly identify with humans, and cannot truly become human.
I think this can be seen in many works of science fiction with philosophical implications.
Vadoo AI
@blueeon @singh_ankur
Dr. Larson was hurt when the audience concluded that his piece -- a simple, engaging form called a two-part invention -- was written by the computer. But he felt somewhat mollified when the listeners went on to decide that the invention composed by EMI (pronounced ''Emmy'') was genuine Bach.
https://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/...
Vadoo AI
writing prompt by own
Create GPT 11
Vadoo AI
Vadoo AI
Prompting?
Would be really funny to see AI prompting AI that handles prompting
Promptception :)
Comment Deleted
CafeSocial.io Mixer
I was thinking about this for a while today, after we had a similar discussion yesterday.
I'll post a longer article on this topic, but I think that in tasks that are novel and require experience humans will outperform AI.
Creative tasks. I think the human mind's creativity is limitless in comparison to what AI could achieve. However, if sentience is achieved, that's a different story
Conversa - Videos That Talk back
It is like asking how will people get from A-B now we have invented the wheel. We will just get there faster and easier.
Everything we have invented in the past has been to support human development. This is no different.