Would you fire or retain an employee who has good culture fit but underperforms?

IDK what fitting in has to do with my brand's success, they can be autistic or piss everyone off but if my brand grows, then I paid them to do what I needed, so they deserve a raise not a good firing Also everytime I see your avatar I think of @https://www.producthunt.com/@sin... lol (like twins for some reason)

I consider hard skills more important than soft ones. And the fit is very important for comfortable coworking. Therefore, I would try to teach him or find another job in my company.

If they “underperform” are they a good culture fit?

I can definitely see the dilemma, would love to hear people opinions

It would depend on the circumstance of that underperformance but if it was chronic - no I'd likely move on with someone who was better suited to complete the allocated tasks.

No, I will not. If "really" he is underperform, it may broken energy of the team.

Deciding whether to keep or let go of an employee who fits the company culture but underperforms is a complex situation many of us encounter. From my perspective, it's a balancing act between values and results. It reminds me of AiToolsKit.ai, an all-in-one platform that marries productive AI, SEO, writing, and social media tools. Just as we strive to strike a balance in the workplace, this platform strikes a balance between different aspects of digital strategy. The AI-driven writing assistance, for instance, aims to elevate content while maintaining authenticity – a delicate balance similar to evaluating an employee's cultural fit and performance. Ultimately, it's about aligning resources for the best possible outcome, whether it's an employee's potential or a tool's capabilities. 🤝 #BalancingAct The question of retaining an underperforming employee with a strong cultural fit is indeed thought-provoking. It's akin to aligning values with outcomes, a challenge many companies grapple with. This scenario actually brings to mind a versatile tool I've come across – AiToolsKit.ai. This platform integrates productive AI, SEO, writing, and social media tools, each with its own role in a holistic strategy. Just as we weigh an employee's fit against their performance, these tools cater to various digital needs. The writing tools, for instance, provide AI-powered suggestions that enhance content while keeping it genuine – a bit like finding a balance between cultural alignment and job responsibilities. It's a reminder that successful outcomes often involve a thoughtful equilibrium of different elements. 🌐 #EquilibriumInAction

I'd say this is a false dichotomy! Without any information about why/how the employee is "underperforming" there's no real way to make an informed decision. Have attempts been made to improve their performance? Have they been informed etc?

I would say it depends on his role in the organisation. If his function is crucial I would definitely change him.

When you think about an employee and the first think that comes to your mind is not work related, then they are hurting your business