happy sunday 👀
gm and welcome back to your weekly roundup of all things tech, shipping, and launching. In today's issue: five of the coolest products last week, a breakdown of AI media, and a forum all about what Cursor can and can't do — yet.
Grow your app with Setapp: revenue, users, & AI

You shipped the app. Now comes the part nobody warns you about.
Billing across dozens of countries. Licensing agreements. Tax compliance. Customer support for users you haven't met yet. And if your app does anything with AI, add provider management and infrastructure costs to the pile. None of that is why you started building — but all of it is now your problem.
Setapp is trying to take it off your plate.
You probably know Setapp as the subscription marketplace — one monthly price, hundreds of Mac apps. On May 21st, they turned toward developers. The pitch is simple: list your app, reach users who are already looking, and let Setapp handle the business layer.
Leaderboard highlights






AI media's ✨ glow up ✨

AI visuals are still in their ✨prolific era✨ and now video’s catching up. OpenAI’s image model in GPT-4o kicked things off with Ghibli portraits and meme-worthy selfies, while Midjourney V7 added a faster draft mode and voice prompts so you can just say your way into concept art.
But the real plot twist? Runway Gen-4. It’s their newest video model, and it’s finally solving a big AI video problem: consistency. Characters stay recognizable, shots flow together, and scenes actually make sense. You can upload a single reference image, type a prompt, and get a short clip that doesn’t feel like it came from five different timelines.
It’s a huge win for indie creators, but also a growing headache for artists whose styles keep showing up in AI outputs they never agreed to. As the tools get better, the questions get louder about ownership, credit, and what counts as creative work when the machine’s doing the heavy lifting.
So yeah, the vibes are strong. The rules? Still in beta.
AI isn’t perfect — yet

Hyuntak Lee asked where Cursor couldn’t quite deliver, and the responses were honest but thoughtful. One dev had it suggest restarting a project entirely, only to later fix the bug with a few tweaks. Another said Cursor feels like a super capable intern—great most of the time, but occasionally too eager.
A few mentioned edge cases, context loss, or chain-reaction edits that solved one thing and broke three others. But no one was rage quitting. It was more like: this tool is powerful, but sometimes you still need to double check its work.
Building with Cursor? This thread’s full of tips for where to keep a closer eye.
Every Sunday
Everything you missed this past week on Product Hunt: Top products, spicy community discourse, key trends on the site, and long-form pieces we’ve recently published.