Launched this week
aperture
hiring is broken. we're building the fix.
288 followers
hiring is broken. we're building the fix.
288 followers
Resumes lie. Keywords are gamed. ATS filters are blind. aperture replaces resume screening with AI-led behavioral interviews and comparative ranking, so teams see who actually stands out before investing time.
aperture
Ai interview prep is great, now how does it compare to JacknJill or Juicebox? What are you the best in the world at?
aperture
@peter_neyra
aperture isn’t a candidate prep platform, it’s built for hiring teams.
Candidates can try a candidate experience to get a feel for how the AI interview works, but it’s not really something you can prep from.
The goal is just to see how people naturally think and respond, and then compare that across the whole candidate pool.
https://aperturehq.org/blog/why-hiring-is-broken/
Awshar AI
aperture
Hey @ankit_narang1,
Good question.
Most tools like heymilo, micro just run standard structured interviews and assign scores to responses
Those scoring systems are usually static and AI-based, making them fairly predictable and easier to reverse-engineer or trick.
aperture is built differently; λ-CORE sits at the center of evaluation
It’s a comparative model, so instead of scoring candidates individually, it looks at how each person performs relative to others in the same pool and updates rankings as more interviews happen https://aperturehq.org/blog/why-every-hiring-score-is-wrong/
That shift matters because it’s not trying to judge “how good” an answer is in isolation; it’s identifying who actually stands out across dimensions like problem-solving, communication, and depth
It also gives candidates a fair shot beyond resumes, while giving teams a much clearer signal on who to focus on
Awshar AI
@harshshroff Nice, i will love to use it