Name: Google Antigravity
Rating: 4.53 (17 reviews)

Google Antigravity - Build the new way

The agent workflow seemed like a meaningful improvement over Cursor. It was easy to follow the agent's code exploration and "though process". The review workflow made it feel very natural to iterate on the agent's proposed solution.

The onboarding/trial felt weak somehow. I ran out of free-usage fairly quickly, and it fell over onto weaker models. I wasn't prompted to upgrade. For a new product, I'd expect to be able to trial it fully-featured, and then decide whether to upgrade.

There were some UI bugs, but nothing I couldn't live with for a new product.

The most important thing is going to be model accuracy. It's worth giving up on UX for better code generation.

In that sense, I actually stalled. Antigravity had momentum, but then stalled and failed over to weaker models. I had to get back to work, so I switched back to Cursor + Claude Code.

RANT ALERT

The whole GEMINI 3.5 (trash) is SO Bloody DISAPPOINTING, I used to be such a MASSIVE Antigravity lover.

I was honestly excited leading up to I/O to see how they take their solid foundation and build on top of it. But look where we're now.

It's honestly a Joke that with all these resources, they CHOSE to make the Fastest Slop Generating model.

They didn't leave AntiGravity IDE Alone either, and chose to ruin it too. WHY DO I NEED 2 APPS? One Codex clone (But worse) and an IDE Which is just mid.

What can we expect from sellouts like windsurf founders, who dropped being one of the only innovative competitors to cursor, to JOIN the DARK SIDE OF TRUST ME BRO BENCHMARKS and STAGED DEMOS (like running doom) [IF they're spear-heading this they're the ones to take the blame for it]

ON TOP OF THIS SHIT SHOW, They have the Audacity to LIE ABOUT 3x Limits in the IDE, they removed the PERFECTLY FUNCTIONAL Browser use which gave video walkthroughs and Debugged (GOATED FEATURE)
and replaced it with /browser which needs to be configured separately and STILL doesn't work.

And wait, THE SLIMIEST THING YET, this HURTS ME as a Die hard Anti Grav user. They CLAIM 3X limits, and STILL CLAUDE Doesn't last a SINGLE PROMPT and being on the pro plan doesn't really mean much.

Also, Can someone from @Google Antigravity tell me WHY Does the GPT Model and other ancillary models offered by AntiGravity, run out when i've never used it? (Eg: I never touch sonnet, but after one prompt to opus; GPT sonnet and G3.1 Pro run out)

IF YOU HAVE SUCH A SURPLUS OF TPUs AND MONEY TO DISH OUT TOKENS on SLOP WHICH MOST SERIOUS USERS NEVER ASKED FOR. Rather allocate more tokens to developers / creators / entrepreneurs who actually use your tools, INSTEAD OF BURNING THEM ON A STUPID BLACK HOLE SIMULATION and Search agents which is going to serve me ADS and not REAL information...

Such a Disgrace and waste of resources and a borderline act of bad faith to its users...

One more thing i cant understand is HOW DOES A TRILLION DOLLAR COMPANY BOASTING ABOUT A QUADRILLION TOKENS SPENT doesn't make good use of it and Blow every competitor out of the water? (Total BS number btw cuz its all being force fed to people with AI MODE which is a Hallucination and machine)
Almost makes me think that its a choice, so they don't get summoned by the Senate for having a Monopoly on this Market too (then its a 5D Chess move)

Most people are gonna be out here glazing google, and i might get banned or flagged for being honest and real. My only question is, Who's to be blamed for this?

AI psychosis is real, and the state of the frontiers is a GREAT EXAMPLE OF IT.

and yes i'm calm, and this is not hate, but frustration and pain from a REAL USER.
Thank you for your attention to this matter @joshtwoodward @logankilpatrick @sundar_pichai

The ability to run multiple coding agents simultaneously significantly accelerated our development cycle, helping us handle complex logic in the extension's backend with much higher efficiency.

For a very long time I had all these ideas that I couldn't act on. Antigravity has allowed me to just explore and create again, which is a wonderful feeling. The recent addition of skills has exploded my workflow productivity, it literally handles my inbox and calendar for me now. I've been a Google fanboy for a long time and I love what they're doing here.

Still has some minor UI quirks and small bugs as expected with a new tool, but nothing that stops the workflow. I’m excited to see more built-in skills added.

I’ve used Cursor and Claude Code extensively, but they always felt like advanced autocomplete. I chose Antigravity because it bridges the gap between "writing code" and "getting things done." The autonomous skills, handling my real-world emails, calendar, and project setup, along with the deep planning it applies to project architecture, make it the only tool that actually feels like a teammate instead of just a text editor.

It actually explains what’s going on, not just writes code.

I used it while working on Terraform + AWS, and it broke down the full flow (API → Lambda) in a way that just made sense
Saves time switching between docs and code
Feels fast and gives straight answers without over-explaining
Helpful when you’re trying to understand why something is happening, not just fix it

Doesn’t always handle bigger projects across multiple files that well
Could give more real-world edge case examples
Sometimes I just want a shorter answer, a bit more control there would help

I tried GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Amazon Q.

Copilot is good for suggestions, but not great at explaining things
Cursor is solid, but felt more general
Amazon Q is useful for AWS, but sometimes too long or not very clear

I went with Antigravity because it felt more practical for what I was doing (infra + APIs).

Some UI quirks and minor bugs, but very powerful overall. I really like how it handles implementation plans and walkthroughs. I think it will be great a couple months from now.

Mostly needs some bugfixes and UI polish. E.g. sometimes one of the panels obscures an Accept/Reject button, so it's hard to see the app is waiting for user input. And when allowing certain commands, I haven't been able to make this stick yet. There's an allowlist for commands in the settings, but this doesn't seem to work for me.

Cursor never quite resonated with me, but I need to give it another shot. Claude Code is great with Opus 4.5, but way too expensive. Antigravity is very close to Claude Code, and as a paid Google AI Pro subscriber I haven't bumped into any limits yet. I actually like Copilot quite a bit as well.

I tried AntiGravity and am very satisfied, as it allowed me to be highly productive and tackle complex tasks efficiently. I am also very grateful to the team for making this possible, and I’m excited for future updates and what’s to come. 😊

I think the biggest potential for improvement probably lies in enhancing the Agents. I’m not currently using the Agent Manager (CTRL + E), because, to be honest, I usually handle one task at a time, as the tasks are very complex and need to be reviewed and understood by me.

Because it integrates Gemini3 in a free tier.

I have been using Anti Gravity for 7 months now and i cannot applaud is more. Its my first Agentic ai that i have used and has managed to maintain same respect from me. Though sometimes we get stuck in simple thing but that i think is more the prompter mistake than the tool . I simply love it and i like to pair it claude and chat-gpt for best results.

For a non tech BA / PM, Google Antigravity is extremely helpful to draft ideas, interactive mockup. I find it easy to use and the generating time is fast.

Good free tier to try out

Google Antigravity

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

Google Antigravity Reviews

The community submitted 17 reviews to tell us what they like about Google Antigravity, what Google Antigravity can do better, and more.

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

Alternatives Considered

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

What's great

vs Alternatives