Schematic is a modern monetization platform. Drive revenue with usage based billing, support sales and product lead deals, and save time with drop in components like customer portals, checkout flows, and paywalls.
We use Schematic to manage everything from self-serve pricing to complex custom enterprise deals. The setup was quick, and now it’s dead simple to add and change plans, enforce usage limits and manage overage pricing. Honestly can’t imagine going back to using the internal entitlement system and one-off manual billing logic.
Schematic has been a huge unlock for our team. We spun up usage-based pricing in no time and started enforcing limits to encourage conversions right away. Even better, we finally have a clear view into which features are driving revenue. It’s saved us so many engineering cycles — this would’ve taken weeks to build ourselves.
I love Schematic's focus on making it super simple to iterate and experiment on SaaS pricing.
This is an area that's often overlooked, and yet is both complex and drives revenue for the business!
Why get stuck with a rigid pricing model when giving your customers more flexibility can make you more enticing to more segments in the market? Boom! TAM TO THE MOON! 😜
🎉 Huge congrats on the launch, Fynn @fynnglover19 and Schematic team! As a fellow builder obsessed with monetization agility, I love how you’re turning billing from a dev headache into a growth lever 🚀. The drop-in portals and usage-based flags are chef’s kiss for SaaS teams wanting to test pricing fast.
One thought: Have you considered adding a sandbox environment for non-devs to simulate pricing changes before deployment? Could reduce billing risks for startups!
P.S. Your SDK feels like a perfect fit for our no-code full-stack Agent Builder Tate-A-Tate. Would love to explore integrating Schematic for our agent creators – let’s chat! 👋
@fynnglover19@rocsheh Glad you see the value! We are actually deploying a sandbox for devs to quickly try things out -- I hadn't thought about one for non-devs, but that makes a lot sense!
@pritraveler We have a free tier to get started, and then our pricing is based off of paid customers that Schematic is managing. Unlike a MOR, we charge a flat amount per customer (not a % of revenue). We've considered a lot of different options here though.
@ryan_echternacht Well, in the website, it says $200/month with 100 monetized subscriptions max, and that doesn't sound like per customer.(or subscription) This kind of pricing must be reasonable for companies that have high-value plans, but may be a little bit expensive for companies with a lot of low-paying customers. $200/100subscriptions means $2/subsciption, and it'll be sometimes over 10% of the revenue.
@pritraveler Makes sense. Our initial ICP so far has been B2B SaaS and AI tools, where this is a good starting point. If you're looking at us for a B2C case (or something else lower ACV), we'd love to talk. This is a growth area for us and we'd love to figure out pricing that works well here.
@ryan_echternacht I understand the policy better now, knowing that B2B was the initial focus. In the future, it would be great to have more options just like how GPT subscriptions and the OpenAI API offer two different ways to use the service. Thank you for the helpful explanation! 😁
I ripped out the entire custom coded pricing page at GetLatka.com about 4 weeks ago and replaced it with Schematic.
Conversions are increasing and my customers are happier.
This is the future of pricing in an AI first world: Seat based pricing going away Usage based pricing will be the standard Price by outcome Price by output Price by task completed ... Schematic enables you to seamlessly track these, bill appropriately, and increase conversions.
The team is extremely responsive as well. They set up a dedicated slack channel with me and Fynn and his entire team have commented/helped/advised.
@nathanlatka Thanks Nathan -- you've also been a great source of feedback and product direction for us!
Report
Monetization is rough and this pain is felt. Does this work well with feature flagging to support the weird use cases of product led intersecting with sales led?
Within your product, Schematic works like a feature flagging tool. You instrument it once around your features and then Schematic tells you (at runtime) which features should be enabled/disabled based on the customer, their plan, and their current usage (if you're using usage based pricing).
Within Schematic, you can grant individual customers an "override" -- essentially, granting them one-off access to features that aren't in their plan by default. A common way we see sales-lead deals is to have a base "enterprise" plan, and then use overrides to add in the specific features that are unique to each deal (or to update the usage limits to what was contractually agreed to)
Report
🔌 Plugged in
Love what Schematic is building. The platform they've created should be the foundation for every company's monetization stack. With Schematic, you can manage billing, pricing, packaging, entitlements, plan customization, and customer-facing components all in one place. What's even better is that all teams across engineering, product and GTM can all collaborate to do what's best for the CUSTOMER without being bogged down by competing roadmap priorities.
Engineering and product can do what they do best - build great products!
GTM teams can do what they do best - close customers quickly with the right pricing and packaging!
Shorter sales cycles, faster expansion and most importantly, happier end customers!
Was literally just talking about this product with my CTO last week, we're switching feature flag providers for cost reasons. We're probably going self-hosted, but man it would be great to solve all our pricing and PLG problems with the same procurement cycle.
Will you guys be doing any open source / self-hosted solutions, or are you guys interacting with the open-source world in any way?
@daniel_singer2 Hey Daniel - that sounds like a very familiar conversation :)
We don't have any immediate plans to support self-hosted deployments, but we hear it all the time so it's something we definitely want to get around to at some point in the not-too-distant future. We're also working on adding OpenFeature support to all of our clients so that it's easier for folks to switch between providers.
Beyond that, all of our clients are open source, and we're increasingly moving more and more logic to the clients in order to make things zippier.
Raycast
I love Schematic's focus on making it super simple to iterate and experiment on SaaS pricing.
This is an area that's often overlooked, and yet is both complex and drives revenue for the business!
Why get stuck with a rigid pricing model when giving your customers more flexibility can make you more enticing to more segments in the market? Boom! TAM TO THE MOON! 😜
Surgeflow
🎉 Huge congrats on the launch, Fynn @fynnglover19 and Schematic team! As a fellow builder obsessed with monetization agility, I love how you’re turning billing from a dev headache into a growth lever 🚀. The drop-in portals and usage-based flags are chef’s kiss for SaaS teams wanting to test pricing fast.
One thought: Have you considered adding a sandbox environment for non-devs to simulate pricing changes before deployment? Could reduce billing risks for startups!
P.S. Your SDK feels like a perfect fit for our no-code full-stack Agent Builder Tate-A-Tate. Would love to explore integrating Schematic for our agent creators – let’s chat! 👋
Schematic
@fynnglover19 @rocsheh Glad you see the value! We are actually deploying a sandbox for devs to quickly try things out -- I hadn't thought about one for non-devs, but that makes a lot sense!
Prit
Awesome product!
Are you planning to offer Schematic with a transaction-fee pricing, like MoRs?
Schematic
@pritraveler We have a free tier to get started, and then our pricing is based off of paid customers that Schematic is managing. Unlike a MOR, we charge a flat amount per customer (not a % of revenue). We've considered a lot of different options here though.
What makes the most sense to you?
Prit
@ryan_echternacht Well, in the website, it says $200/month with 100 monetized subscriptions max, and that doesn't sound like per customer.(or subscription) This kind of pricing must be reasonable for companies that have high-value plans, but may be a little bit expensive for companies with a lot of low-paying customers. $200/100subscriptions means $2/subsciption, and it'll be sometimes over 10% of the revenue.
Schematic
@pritraveler Makes sense. Our initial ICP so far has been B2B SaaS and AI tools, where this is a good starting point. If you're looking at us for a B2C case (or something else lower ACV), we'd love to talk. This is a growth area for us and we'd love to figure out pricing that works well here.
Prit
@ryan_echternacht I understand the policy better now, knowing that B2B was the initial focus. In the future, it would be great to have more options just like how GPT subscriptions and the OpenAI API offer two different ways to use the service. Thank you for the helpful explanation! 😁
Founderpath
I ripped out the entire custom coded pricing page at GetLatka.com about 4 weeks ago and replaced it with Schematic.
Conversions are increasing and my customers are happier.
This is the future of pricing in an AI first world:
Seat based pricing going away
Usage based pricing will be the standard
Price by outcome
Price by output
Price by task completed
... Schematic enables you to seamlessly track these, bill appropriately, and increase conversions.
The team is extremely responsive as well. They set up a dedicated slack channel with me and Fynn and his entire team have commented/helped/advised.
Highly recommend!
I track GetLatka.com revenue growth in Founderpath.com :
Schematic
@nathanlatka Thanks Nathan -- you've also been a great source of feedback and product direction for us!
Monetization is rough and this pain is felt. Does this work well with feature flagging to support the weird use cases of product led intersecting with sales led?
Schematic
@brent_gann Yes! 2 points on this:
Within your product, Schematic works like a feature flagging tool. You instrument it once around your features and then Schematic tells you (at runtime) which features should be enabled/disabled based on the customer, their plan, and their current usage (if you're using usage based pricing).
Within Schematic, you can grant individual customers an "override" -- essentially, granting them one-off access to features that aren't in their plan by default. A common way we see sales-lead deals is to have a base "enterprise" plan, and then use overrides to add in the specific features that are unique to each deal (or to update the usage limits to what was contractually agreed to)
Love what Schematic is building. The platform they've created should be the foundation for every company's monetization stack. With Schematic, you can manage billing, pricing, packaging, entitlements, plan customization, and customer-facing components all in one place. What's even better is that all teams across engineering, product and GTM can all collaborate to do what's best for the CUSTOMER without being bogged down by competing roadmap priorities.
Engineering and product can do what they do best - build great products!
GTM teams can do what they do best - close customers quickly with the right pricing and packaging!
Shorter sales cycles, faster expansion and most importantly, happier end customers!
Schematic
@vijay_nagappan Absolutely!
Was literally just talking about this product with my CTO last week, we're switching feature flag providers for cost reasons. We're probably going self-hosted, but man it would be great to solve all our pricing and PLG problems with the same procurement cycle.
Will you guys be doing any open source / self-hosted solutions, or are you guys interacting with the open-source world in any way?
Schematic
@daniel_singer2 Hey Daniel - that sounds like a very familiar conversation :)
We don't have any immediate plans to support self-hosted deployments, but we hear it all the time so it's something we definitely want to get around to at some point in the not-too-distant future. We're also working on adding OpenFeature support to all of our clients so that it's easier for folks to switch between providers.
Beyond that, all of our clients are open source, and we're increasingly moving more and more logic to the clients in order to make things zippier.