Sentry

Application monitoring and error tracking software

4.9•71 reviews•

391 followers

Application monitoring and error tracking software

4.9•71 reviews•

391 followers

Visit website

Issue tracking software

•

Testing and QA software

Self-hosted and cloud-based application monitoring that helps software teams see clearer, solve quicker, & learn continuously.

Sentry Reviews

The community submitted 71 reviews to tell us what they like about Sentry, what Sentry can do better, and more.

4.9

Based on 71 reviews

Review Sentry?

Reviewers mostly see Sentry as a dependable way to catch production errors fast, with useful stack traces, grouping, filtering, and broad integrations that make debugging quicker and less reliant on user reports. Founders behind products like Greta and Git Pitcher say it gives real-time visibility and enough context to fix issues quickly, while Flux notes the gap comes after detection: reproducing and fully resolving failures can still take extra work.

+69

Summarized with AI

Pros

real-time error tracking (26)

seamless integrations (8)

performance monitoring (7)

detailed stack traces (4)

error alerts (4)

detailed diagnostics (3)

dashboard usability (2)

flexible setup (2)

Pros

Cons

FramerLaunch websites with enterprise needs at startup speeds.

Promoted

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (66)

View all founder reviews

Other Reviews (5)

View all

We Are Learning

•6 reviews

At "We Are Learning," Sentry has been a cornerstone for real-time error monitoring, significantly enhancing our debugging efficiency and system stability. Its real-time error capture, coupled with rich contextual data, has enabled us to identify and resolve issues with remarkable speed and accuracy. The seamless integration with our existing tech stack, including Microsoft Azure, ensures that our DevOps and development teams receive immediate notifications for prompt action. However, one area for improvement could be the inclusion of machine learning algorithms to predict potential system failures based on error patterns, which would allow for more proactive issue resolution. Overall, despite this room for enhancement, Sentry remains a crucial tool in our arsenal for maintaining a high level of service reliability and operational excellence.

What's great

seamless integrations (8)real-time error tracking (26)

Report

16 views2yr ago

used Sentry to build Termdock

•3 reviews

Sentry is critical for Termdock and our backend services across error monitoring and performance tracing. Its issue grouping and release tracking let us map multi‑project, multi‑workspace events to the correct versions. Source Maps and Stack Traces speed up debugging, while Performance tracing visualizes slow transactions and bottlenecks. With alert rules and environment tags, we can quickly pinpoint issues in a terminal‑driven workflow and trace them back to the corresponding commit. We evaluated New Relic, Datadog, and Firebase Crashlytics. They excel at broad observability and mobile crash reporting, but we prioritize consistent frontend‑backend error context, fine‑grained release/environment segmentation, and a developer‑friendly debugging experience. As a result, we chose Sentry as the core to ensure stability, speed, and traceability when multiple projects run in parallel.

Report

18 views6mo ago

used Sentry to build Git Pitcher

•6 reviews

I chose Sentry because Git Pitcher depends on reliable repo analysis and generation flows. If users hit errors during sign-up, generation, export, or sharing, I need to know quickly. Sentry gives me production error tracking, stack traces, and enough context to fix issues fast without guessing.

Alternatives Considered

Report

1 view7d ago