• Subscribe
  • Bootstrap vs VC for SaaS?

    Roman Gordy
    39 replies
    I personally agree with Patrick Campbell, CEO of ProfitWell, who said: "Before reaching series A, live as much as possible on your own and your customers' money. Otherwise, you'll have more dilution and find yourself in a less advantageous position in negotiations." Which side are you on?

    Replies

    Janna Bastow
    Intercom
    Intercom
    Top Product
    The real answer is, it DEPENDS. And this is coming from me, a founder who's successfully bootstrapped a B2B saas co for the last 10 years and going (watch this space, we're launching a new suite of AI tools for ProdPad next Monday 😎 https://www.producthunt.com/prod...). But that's really the key: Ours was a B2B SaaS. We (my co-founder @simoncast and I) were able to build something that we could sell to a few businesses, and then a few more, and it wasn't long before ProdPad was paying our bills, and allowing us to expand our team alongside the growth of our customers. If you can go this route, DO IT. The VC track is risky and expensive. I'm really glad we didn't give away equity in the early days of ProdPad. However, the VC track might be for you. Some products need more R&D than others, if you're working in deep tech, hardware, or anything that requires building up more than just a simple sales motion. Building a marketplace or something for the B2C masses? You better have a war chest of cash on hand to carry you through the long slog while things build up, as the value for those types of businesses often don't make themselves immediately tangible on your balance sheet until way down the line. The key thing is is to know what you're building, how you're going to monetize, and therefore, allowing you to choose how you're going to fund it and build it more wisely. Happy building, folks!
    Frank Sondors
    Depends on how fast you could grow.
    Paul Mit
    Bootstrap!
    Neel Patel
    Frugal always.
    Kayode Odeleye
    Who Wants to Be a Unicorn (Unicorn Game)
    Who Wants to Be a Unicorn (Unicorn Game)
    I've selected bootstrap, that has been my journey over the past 3 years but I believe the correct answer lies somewhere between bootstrap and VC There are few, very few software businesses that can break even without funding Ideally, those funds should come from other sources and not VC but it's not accurate to advise everyone to bootstrap It is damn painful
    Kayode Odeleye
    Who Wants to Be a Unicorn (Unicorn Game)
    Who Wants to Be a Unicorn (Unicorn Game)
    By the way, we are tackling this issue at Caena and launch Who Wants to Be a Unicorn, a fundraising game in a few hours, take a look, try the game and support us :)
    Roman Gordy
    @kayovin1 True! Even some beneficial products fail being dissolved between other VC-funded startup marketing campaigns.
    Kayode Odeleye
    Who Wants to Be a Unicorn (Unicorn Game)
    Who Wants to Be a Unicorn (Unicorn Game)
    Wonderful topic Roman and one I'm passionate about, in fact, we are launching Who Wants to be a Unicorn, a fundraising game later this morning to shed light on how venture capital really works. Check it out:)
    Relja Denic
    Bootstrap all the way baby :D
    I agree that if you have the chance to skip the seed round and grow with your own funds, it's better not to bring in early investors
    Jake Harrison
     Free Essay Checker AI
    Free Essay Checker AI
    I agree! Don’t choose VC at first, especially at this time, it can let you find true PMF and make money and Day 1
    Bon
    If the goal is to scale and increase company valuation, VC is the way to go. VCs aim for rapid growth and scaling to achieve higher valuations and successful exits. This often comes with significant funding, fast expansion, and immense pressure on the founding team, potentially affecting company strategy and culture. However, if you're just looking for a steady income, bootstrapping is a great choice. This approach emphasizes steady growth and profitability, allowing founders to maintain full control without external investor pressures, operating at their own pace For me, I prefer Bootstrap.
    Shushant Lakhyani
    I'd say bootstrap to learn things the hard way, and I'd say VC if you want to then get into the rat race of chasing valuations and fund raising
    Roman Gordy
    @shushant_lakhyani unless the product isn't something pricey and involves hi-tech scientists to prepare MVP, you have to keep VC in mind only for some future growth steps (maybe)
    Bhargav Patel
    VC sounds fairly interesting when you create a successful product and your investors are not looking for results from day one of their investments! If any calculations go wrong, the founder will find him/herself raising the very next round they close their round number 'x'! Keep the control in your hands, try to go frugal, and plan out to go bootstrap.
    Daniel Zaitzow
    @bhargav5394 I think it also depends on the competition in the space - If you need to get to scale to sustain or attain market share - being VC backed might allow you to get to those targets faster.
    Yavuz Tunc Emran
    Tamly: Automate B2B Sales Outreach
    Tamly: Automate B2B Sales Outreach
    It depends on your goals and risk tolerance. Bootstrap for control and slow growth, VC for rapid expansion with diluted ownership.
    Jacopo Proietti
    I'd say it depends on many factors, like your market and funding of competitors. In general, I think the best practice should be staying bootstrapped until you haven't validated product-market fit. Once you have that, bringing capital is the best way to start scaling fast.
    Roman Gordy
    @jacopo_proietti good point! Though I have some examples how companies with full pockets of VC funds didn't compete well. When VC means money+competence+network it can worth a part of control.
    Jacopo Proietti
    @arbonum Yes agreed. Plenty of well-funded teams that ended up not competing successfully. Indeed, it can be that the investor support wasn't the right one, or also that the company was raising without a clear way to execute their investment. I think one should look at VC or investors as a way to execute quicker on their strategy, but as a founder, if this is not clear yet, there's not much a VC can do for you.
    I believe if you had the expertise to live with your own/customers money, this means that you know how to operate a business, nowadays a lot of startups were so "inflated" with external capital but unfortunately they're only bleeding left and right. I highly recommend before been responsible for someone else money, be with your own.
    Anna Kasumova
    The best way is not to wait investors and their money and build and promote your product yourself.
    Dave-Anthony Smith
    Embrace the bootstrap journey until it's absolutely necessary to pivot. This advice isn't limited to just SaaS; it applies to nearly any product. Venture capital funding doesn't just dilute your ownership significantly; it often imposes unrealistic revenue targets on early-stage companies that are still navigating uncharted waters. Moreover, countless ventures stumble because they haven't experienced the invaluable lessons of acquiring and retaining customers the hard way. There's something special about growing organically and adapting your strategies as you gain wisdom along the path.