Launched this week
AI Search Console
Prompt analytics and citation mapping for AI search
675 followers
Prompt analytics and citation mapping for AI search
675 followers
AI Search Console helps SEO and GEO teams replace manual AI visibility checks with repeatable data. Track brand mentions, rankings, share of voice, competitors, and cited sources across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Analyze visibility at the individual prompt level, find content and citation gaps, and generate client-ready reports without spreadsheets or screenshots.
AI Search Console
Hey Product Hunt! 👋
I’m Ilia, founder of AI Search Console.
We built it after repeatedly hearing the same question from SEO agencies and their clients:
“Are we actually showing up in ChatGPT?”
The usual way to answer was surprisingly manual: run a few prompts, take screenshots, copy the results into a spreadsheet, and try to guess whether visibility was improving.
That approach breaks down quickly. AI answers vary by prompt, model, market, and time. A handful of manual checks cannot reliably show your share of voice, explain why a competitor appears more often, or identify which sources influence the answers.
AI Search Console turns that process into repeatable analytics. It monitors how your brand and competitors appear across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, down to the individual prompt and cited source.
What you can analyze:
– Prompt-level brand mentions and rankings
– Multi-model share of voice
– Competitor visibility and content gaps
– The domains and pages cited in AI answers
– The prompts where your brand appears and where it is missing
– Trends over time and client-ready reports
This matters because AI visibility is not determined only by your website or Google rankings. AI platforms may rely on review sites, editorial articles, communities, comparison pages, and other third-party sources. You can rank well in traditional search and still be mostly absent from AI-generated recommendations.
AI Search Console helps teams move from:
“Let’s manually check a few prompts”
to:
“Here is our visibility, here is the gap, and here are the sources and prompts behind it.”
It’s built primarily for SEO/GEO agencies and brands that need a measurable way to understand and improve their presence in AI search.
I’ll be here all day and would genuinely love your feedback. Ask me anything 🙏
💜 You can also try our demo: https://app.search-console.ai/demo
SocLeads
@iluhich Congratulations!
AI Search Console
@gorns Thanks!
AI Search Console
@iluhich @gorns thanks a lot 👍👍
Fundraisly
@iluhich @gorns Thanks!
Fundraisly
@iluhich Great launch! How do you handle multilingual prompt variations?
AI Search Console
@alena_medvedevaa Thanks, Alena! Each project currently supports one language. To track another language, you can simply create a separate project, which the platform allows you to do
AI Search Console
@iluhich @alena_medvedevaa Alena, thank you!!!
Fundraisly
@iluhich @alena_medvedevaa Thanks!
@iluhich Congrats on the launch...the ai citation mapping angle is amazing.
AI Search Console
@dmitrii_volosatov Thank you! Citation mapping is one of the core parts of the product, so really glad it resonated
AI Search Console
@iluhich @dmitrii_volosatov Dmitrii, appreciate it
AI Search Console
@dmitrii_volosatov Thank you 🤝
Fundraisly
@iluhich A truly necessary tool today. Can we organize prompts by customer journey?
AI Search Console
@uladzislau_sakalou Yes! You can group prompts around different stages of the customer journey and track each group separately
AI Search Console
@iluhich @uladzislau_sakalou yeah, sound like a good idea to group them according to the funnel stages
AI Search Console
@uladzislau_sakalou Thank you for the feedback!
Fundraisly
@iluhich Let's go!
AI Search Console
@solodnev 💪💪💪
We looked at building a scrappy version of this in-house a few weeks ago and stopped, for a reason I'd be curious how you handle. At zero citations there is nothing to measure. Our site is young enough that every prompt came back with no mention, which is a valid data point exactly once.
So the tool seems to earn its keep somewhere above a zero baseline. Do you have a sense of where that floor sits, or do early-stage users get value from the competitor and cited-source side while their own mentions are still empty?
AI Search Console
@supplymo That’s a fair point. Even with zero mentions, users can still see which competitors and sources AI relies on, giving them a clear roadmap for what to improve. There isn’t a strict minimum baseline, but the value is higher when the category already appears in AI answers
AI Search Console
@supplymo Thank you for the thoughtful question! At zero mentions, competitor coverage and cited sources still show where the opportunity is.
@evsial That's the part I was missing. If the category already shows up, the cited-source view is doing a different job than tracking your own name.
The one I'd watch, and someone raised it further up the thread, is what the answer says about you rather than whether it said it. In our category an AI answer that invents a guaranteed duty rate is worse for us than not being mentioned at all, because the reader arrives already believing a number we would never put in writing.
AI Search Console
@evsial @supplymo Exactly. Being mentioned isn’t always positive if the answer is wrong. We already capture the full responses, and we’re exploring a way to compare claims against verified facts provided by the company and flag contradictions automatically
Fundraisly
@supplymo @evsial True!
Fundraisly
@supplymo Really appreciate your interest!
cited sources is the field i actually care about. i publish technical posts and i can see reactions and views, which tells me almost nothing, because a reader who got the answer from an assistant never shows up in any of my numbers at all.
the one i would gently push back on is ranking and share of voice. those come from a world with ten positions on a page. in an answer there is no position, you are in it or you are not, so cited or not cited is the real metric and a rank number risks being the comfort version of it...
AI Search Console
@alex_watson2110 You are right, Alex. and we largely agree that citations are the strongest signal.
Our “ranking” isn’t meant as a traditional SERP position. It reflects how consistently and prominently a brand appears across tracked prompts and models, while share of voice shows how often it appears versus competitors.
But yes, cited vs. not cited is ultimately the clearest metric, especially for publishers
AI Search Console
@alex_watson2110 exactly! This is why we offe share of voice as one of the main metrics
Fundraisly
@alex_watson2110 Thank you so much for the support!
Presence and correctness are two different problems and only one of them is in these metrics. Being cited says you were in the answer. It does not say the answer described you correctly.
The version that costs money is a confident wrong attribute. The answer says you integrate with something you do not, or that there is a free tier when there is not. The reader never opens the source, so they arrive already believing it, and share of voice scores that as a good day.
Do you capture what the answers claim about a brand, or only whether it appeared?
AI Search Console
@jernej_jan_kocica
Completely agree! presence and correctness are different metrics. We capture the full answers and citations, not just whether the brand appeared, so users can review exactly what was said. Automated accuracy detection is something we’re exploring next.
@iluhich On the accuracy piece, I would keep the scope narrow. Judging whether an answer is accurate in general is hard, but a smaller version is not: the claims that map to a fact you already publish. Free tier or not, which integrations exist, what a plan costs. Those you can diff, and everything else stays a human read.
Which makes it an input problem rather than a model problem. Let the customer hand you the canonical list of facts about themselves, and detect contradictions against that instead of trying to judge truth.
Would you take a file like that from customers, if they kept it current?
AI Search Console
@jernej_jan_kocica That’s a smart approach. Yes, we’d definitely consider letting customers upload and maintain a canonical facts file, then flagging contradictions against it. Much more practical than trying to judge every answer as objectively true
Fundraisly
@jernej_jan_kocica Thanks for checking us out!
Congratulations on the release. I've been following this space closely myself. The biggest challenge we're currently facing is:
The output gap between consumer-facing (C-end) products and vendor API platforms.
Our GEO system integrates through the vendors' open platform APIs, while end users interact with the vendors' own C-end products. Between the two layers, the "invisible capabilities" built into C-end products—such as system prompts, knowledge bases, and web search—are not exposed through the open platforms. As a result, the model responses we receive are inherently weaker than what the C-end delivers, which undermines the accuracy of our downstream analysis.
In short: responses from the open API systematically underperform the C-end, primarily because the underlying prompts and knowledge base configurations are opaque and inaccessible to us.
AI Search Console
@milo_lee Agree. API output and the consumer product aren’t equivalent. That’s why we try to measure the end-user experience directly wherever possible, rather than treating raw API responses as a reliable proxy
Fundraisly
@milo_lee Thank you for the thoughtful question!
AI Search Console
@milo_lee Thanks for supporting us this day!
Hi, great product. Beautiful, pleasant design, and a good name.
The only thing that's unclear is the pricing - what a "credit" actually is and how they're counted.
AI Search Console
@oleksandr_utkin Thanks, Oleksandr! One credit equals one checked prompt across one model
AI Search Console
@oleksandr_utkin Thank you! We’re glad you find it useful.
AI Search Console
@oleksandr_utkin oleksandr, thank you!
Fundraisly
@oleksandr_utkin Really appreciate you taking the time!
AI Search Console
@oleksandr_utkin Thanks for supporting us this day!
Hi! Congratulations on the launch!
How long will the free trial last? And what happens after it ends?
AI Search Console
@julia_zakharova2 Hi Julia, thank you! The free trial lasts 3 days. After it ends, you can choose a paid plan to continue tracking, and nothing is charged automatically
AI Search Console
@julia_zakharova2 Thank you! Hope you enjoy trying it.
AI Search Console
@julia_zakharova2 Thank you, Julia!
Fundraisly
@julia_zakharova2 Thank you, glad this resonated!
AI Search Console
@julia_zakharova2 Thanks for supporting us this day!