Launching today

HeyZoku
Orchestrate an army of coding agents with your voice.
60 followers
Orchestrate an army of coding agents with your voice.
60 followers
The voice-first agentic dev environment for Mac. Run ten coding agents at once without babysitting them — spawn, redirect, and interrupt Claude, Codex, and Cursor by name, just by talking. On-device speech, your own subscriptions, one-time price.




Voice as the control layer makes sense for orchestration specifically — you're issuing intent, not typing code, and intent is the part that survives being spoken.
Where I'd expect it to get awkward is the return path. Agents running in parallel produce output in parallel, but speech is strictly serial. If three of them come back with questions at once, does it queue them, interrupt, or fall back to the screen for anything that needs a real answer? Feels like the hardest design problem in the whole thing isn't the listening, it's deciding what's worth speaking.
@ark_y_k voice is a central layer of it and its work to manage your agents, workspace and worktrees. It can spawn agents. So the design works like you ask it to spawn and agent to do X work when its done or it needs you, it will just tell you loudly that its done or it needs you, it will not by itself tell you everything, if you ask it to brief you then it will. so the problem never comes, it's a layer which just do what you ask it to over your multiple cli agents running.
I hope this helps, please ask if you have any more doubts.
Zivy
Congrats on the launch, @dangibuilds ! 🎉 Love the idea of making terminal agents truly voice-first, especially with offline processing using Parakeet.
One question: how do you handle situations where multiple CLI agents could interpret the same voice command differently? Is there an orchestration layer that routes commands to the right agent, or do users explicitly choose which agent they're talking to? Curious about the UX.
Thank you @harkirat_singh3777
Yes there is a central layer which manages everything, controlling the agents, understanding the commands and yes user choose which agent they are talking to.
But the user can also ask one particular agent like fable in claude code to be the orchestrator and ask it to add more terminals of cursor grok 4.5 to read and implement the tasks in parallel.
Congrats on the launch! Letting a dev run a whole fleet of coding agents hands-free, completely offline, is a bold bet on where developer tools are heading. When multiple agents want your attention at once, how do you decide what actually gets surfaced to you versus queued?
@jacklyn_i whenever an agent needs your attention, it just tells you like Sarah needs your attention. then you can ask it to focus Sarah or brief you about it.