Should AI replace human workers if it's more cost-effective?
Hibba Shahid
6 replies
Replies
Nathan Covey@nathancovey
Yes. Like all other disruptive technologies, humans will find a way to adapt and create new roles that AI can't do.
Share
I’m not sure AI should fully replace human workers, even if it’s cheaper. The human element adds value in ways AI can’t match, like empathy and complex decision-making. Balancing AI and human roles seems like the best approach to me.
We should definitely consider AI for tasks where it’s more cost-effective, but we must also think about the impact on jobs and ensure we’re not losing the human touch that’s so valuable in many roles.
I think AI can be a great tool to handle repetitive tasks and improve efficiency. However, I believe human creativity and emotional intelligence are irreplaceable, so I’d be cautious about replacing workers entirely.
Alterfy
This is a really tricky subject. However, business is business, and yes, I believe so if it can do it effectively.