We re officially in nominees season for the Orbit Awards: AI Workflow Automation.

Hi all - I've built @Mnexium AI and I thought the fastest way to get folks to try was it to build a chat plug-in for websites. I am providing free keys (however much usage it may be) to anyone who is willing to try it.

The plug-in can be found on NPM https://www.npmjs.com/package/@m...

npm install @mnexium/chat

GitScrum was built by engineers who got tired of pretending this was sustainable.

Dark Mode Isn't a Theme, It's a Philosophy

Fifty-four IDE color schemes. Dracula, Nord, Tokyo Night, Catppuccin, Monokai Pro. Not because it's trendy, but because developers are viscerally attached to their environments. Switching from VSCode to a project management tool shouldn't feel like stepping into fluorescent-lit corporate purgatory.

Meow world, welcome back to The Breakpoint, a weekly thread on all things dev tools on Product Hunt.

The latest

Recent dev-first products launched on the site

Every feed today claims to be better curated or more relevant.
But most of them still measure success by how long you stay.

I ve caught myself opening Twitter or YouTube to check one specific thing, then resurfacing 30 45 minutes later,

wondering where the time went.

Curious how this plays out for others here.
When you open a feed for a quick check, how long do you actually stay?
And does it usually feel worth it after?

One of the coolest parts of my job is getting a front-row seat to how @marianaprazeres thinks about AI.
Memory feels table stakes in AI right now. But for @Meet-Ting, it s not just a log of the past - it s a living system that shapes how people schedule, work, and want to spend their week.
It s not just logistics - it s patterns around energy, priorities, and relationships over time.

Here are a few things we learned while designing and testing agent memory in production:

A short one today, but packed with milestones:

We just hit 350,000 prompts improved, 25,000 users, and launched 5 new Quality-of-Life updates:

Trace tends to show up where workflows get complex. The parts of work that involve reasoning, coordination, and follow ups instead of simple triggers.

If you are using Trace, we want to hear how. What kind of workflow is it handling for you? What problem finally felt manageable once Trace was in the mix?

Wordware tends to appeal to people who want more control over how AI logic flows through their work. Less magic, more intention.

If Wordware is something you rely on, share how you are using it. What workflow did you build that felt worth keeping?

Airtop often shows up when workflows need to interact with real interfaces, not just APIs. The kind of automation that feels closer to how humans actually work.

If Airtop is doing real work for you, tell us what that looks like. What task did it finally take off your plate?

Gumloop often replaces the custom but fragile scripts people were maintaining themselves. It gives structure to workflows that used to live half in code and half in someone s head.

If you are using Gumloop, share what it is doing for you now. What workflow did you finally stop babysitting?

Lindy usually earns its place by handling the kind of work that is repetitive, interrupt driven, and easy to forget. The stuff that eats time quietly.

If Lindy is part of your workflow, tell us how. What does it handle for you automatically? What do you no longer have to remember?

Relay shows up when workflows start to feel brittle and you want something more intentional than a chain of rules. It is often about coordination, not just automation.

If Relay is part of how your work moves forward, tell us what it is responsible for. What does it orchestrate? What used to fall through the cracks?

Since I haven't been able to meet my work goals very well in the last few quarters, I now plan to approach them more systematically and not push myself too hard on work goals, as that ultimately led to problems that made my plan less sustainable.

So here is my structure and list:

This debate often gets framed as Should researchers use AI for literature reviews?

I think the real question is different.

Is it ethical to spend hundreds of researcher hours on mechanical work when that time could be spent advancing actual knowledge?

Think about a researcher spending an entire weekend searching papers, skimming irrelevant abstracts, copying citations, and fixing references. That s not insight or discovery. That s overhead.

Most AI platforms treat memory like a walled garden.

What you tell ChatGPT stays in ChatGPT. What Claude learns about you stays in Claude.

People frame this as a "memory" problem. We don't think it is. It's an interoperability problem.

Throughout building our universal memory layer, this is the pattern we kept seeing:

We re building Swatle for modern, lean teams that care more about speed and outcomes than heavy processes.

Swatle works like a powerful project management tool but with a twist. You can create intelligent AI chatbots for customer support, sales, and more. When something needs human attention, it automatically creates a task.

Here s the game changer: you can assign tasks to AI agents and yes, your AI agents can assign tasks to you too.

Sounds interesting? Give it a try and experience a new way of working.

Hey builders!
It was amazing collaborating last year and exploring AI tools for work productivity through our launch of the Portals platform. Through that experience, we talked to power users and experimented with the latest technology for AI agents, tool calling, and RAG and vector databases.
Based on those learnings, we've been working hard to build the next rendition of a powerful agent. Many users are looking for solutions to build and manage their technical products and digital businesses, and no-code tools and vibe coding are the biggest trends in the AI scene right now.

Today we're launching Subterranean, an AI no-code platform for building complete apps focused on reliability, design, and a network of built-in systems to make every part of product development capable of being outsourced to agents.
Check out our launch here! https://www.producthunt.com/prod...

1. The lack of a service that creates hyper-personalized, gamified English courses (in the Duolingo format) for narrow professional niches (e.g., for a barista in a vegan coffee shop or a startup founder.

2. Automating cross-posting of an indie hacker's technical content across multiple platforms (Twitter, LinkedIn, Product Hunt) while adhering to each platform's best practices.

Yesterday, I had an unpleasant experience. For a few minutes, I lost my LinkedIn community of several thousand people (TL;DR: I was falsely accused of using suspicious software).

Fortunately, I got my account back but it was a strong reminder that we don t own platforms, nor our profiles on them.

I spend most of my time on these two things:
1) observing products on the main page and upvoting/commenting on them

2) talking with people within comments under my forums

The second one is the one where I notice some things that I lack and see possible improvements, namely:

Hey Product Hunt community!

This is YUKI from the Typeless marketing team.

Let's be honest: mobile typing is broken. We lose ideas because typing feels like too much work. We delay replies because it's tedious. We fight autocorrect, fix typos, and hope our messages don't sound rushed.

This is why we built Typeless for Android AI voice dictation that transforms how you communicate on mobile.

A tagline is the first piece of content a user will see about your product on the leaderboard. It's so important that you get it right. You should be able to get a really solid idea of what your product is just by reading a handful of words.

In the spirit of forever optimising our taglines, I wanted to do a little experiment:

What s worked for us looks very different from spray-and-pray.

We ve learned that outbound works when it s intentional at every step.

A few things that made the biggest difference for us:

Getting the ICP really right. Sometimes the first outreach isn t to the buyer, but to someone who can open the door.
Personalization isn t optional. Company context, role, recent updates. Generic gets ignored fast.
Channels are chosen by output, not comfort. We double down on what actually converts.
The first message rarely works. Conversations usually start around the third or fourth touch, if there s value each time.
Timing matters more than volume. Funding news, hiring, social posts. Showing up when the problem is top of mind changes everything.
We focus on relationships, not just pipeline. Some buy later. Some refer. All conversations compound.
Context before calls helps. If someone engages multiple times, the conversation feels very different.
Signals matter. Engagement often tells you when to reach out, not just who.

Whether you work remotely or on-site, and who you work with, may not be the most important thing.
What really matters is how you handle the situation.

Personally, I find myself quite flexible with both on-site and remote work.
But as an introvert who isn t very strong at communication, I usually prefer working alone rather than in crowded environments and I tend to be more productive that way.

That said, I also realize that a lack of real human interaction can indirectly affect both the process and the final outcome of work.