Unosend - Send transactional + marketing email w/ 99.9% deliverability

@bittucreator Advanced analytics could be super useful.

@jim_engine It looks like a dark mode thing, but yeah the styles do look a bit broken.

@jim_engine  Explain bit more

@hasin 

Thanks so much! Really glad you like the clean UI - we put a lot of effort into making it developer-friendly 🙏

Great question about PHP/Laravel! Yes, we have a PHP SDK ready to go:

For Laravel specifically, you can also use it as a mail driver.

We're working on a dedicated Laravel package with Mailables support and would love your feedback on what features would be most useful!

Check out our docs: https://unosend.com/docs

@buiducnhat 

The free tier is definitely a highlight (5,000 emails/month vs Resend's 3,000), but there's more:

Beyond the free tier:

• 💰 Better value - $20/mo gets you 50K emails AND 10,000 contacts (Resend's $20 only gives you 50K emails, no contacts included)

• 🚀 Higher rate limits - 50 emails/sec vs Resend's 10/sec

• 🔌 Same simple API - If you know Resend, you already know Unosend (drop-in compatible)

Same great features:

• Beautiful developer experience

• Webhooks, tracking, templates

• React Email support

• All the SDKs you need

We built Unosend because we love what Resend did for email DX, but felt the pricing was holding back indie hackers and startups. Same philosophy, friendlier on the wallet 🙌

@chilarai 

Thanks for the interest! 🙌

Yes, we offer tracking!

• Open tracking - Know when recipients open your emails

• Click tracking - Track which links get clicked

• Delivery webhooks - Real-time notifications for delivered, bounced, and complained events

About spam detection:
Directly detecting if an email lands in spam isn't possible (no email provider can do this - it's determined by the recipient's mail server). However, we help you maximize inbox placement:

• 📊 Bounce & complaint monitoring - High rates often indicate deliverability issues

• 🔐 Full authentication - We handle SPF, DKIM, and DMARC automatically

• 📈 Sending reputation - Our infrastructure maintains high sender reputation

If you're seeing deliverability issues, the complaint/bounce rates in your dashboard are usually the best indicators.

@sankalp_choudhary 

We have fixed issues. please try again

@nimaaksoy 

Thanks, Nima, that means a lot. We aimed for a developer-first flow: fast setup, clean API, and predictable pricing.

@lev_kerzhner Thanks Lev — appreciate it!

@joshh_founder 

Deliverability:

We run our own email infrastructure - full control over IPs and reputation. Proper SPF, DKIM, DMARC is automatic for every verified domain.

Abuse Prevention:

• Domain verification required before sending

• Rate limiting & bounce monitoring

• Separate IP pools - bad actors don't affect you

• Dedicated IP option on Scale/Enterprise plans

Bottom line: Verified domain + our authentication = inbox delivery. We maintain our IP reputation and isolate problematic accounts to protect everyone.

here are some features that are fairly table stakes to me:

- be able to have multiple projects with their own domains
- simple API

-deliverability metrics

- (nice to have) some idempotency protection

-( nice to have) a sense of best practices and if my emails meet them

@catt_marroll 

Dark mode bug: Thanks for flagging - will fix that ASAP.

Why switch from Resend:

✅ Multiple projects with own domains - Yes, built-in
✅ Simple API - Same RESTful simplicity you're used to
✅ Deliverability metrics - Opens, clicks, bounces, complaints
✅ Idempotency - Coming soon
✅ Best practices check - On the roadmap

What you get that Resend charges extra for:

• Contacts/Audience - built-in, no external DB needed

• Broadcasts - send to all contacts natively

• Webhooks - included, no Zapier required

Pricing: More generous free tier + lower costs at scale.